1964 Alpine A 110 vs. 1999 Lincoln LS
To start off, 1999 Lincoln LS is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Alpine A 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Alpine A 110 would be higher. At 2,967 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Lincoln LS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Lincoln LS (211 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 162 more horse power than 1964 Alpine A 110. (49 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Lincoln LS should accelerate faster than 1964 Alpine A 110. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Lincoln LS weights approximately 1077 kg more than 1964 Alpine A 110. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Alpine A 110 | 1999 Lincoln LS | |
Make | Alpine | Lincoln |
Model | A 110 | LS |
Year Released | 1964 | 1999 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 956 cc | 2967 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 211 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 65 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 72 mm | 79.5 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 575 kg | 1652 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4930 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2140 mm | 2990 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 68 L |