1964 Alpine A 110 vs. 2000 Daewoo Musiro
To start off, 2000 Daewoo Musiro is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Alpine A 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Alpine A 110 would be higher. At 2,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Daewoo Musiro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Daewoo Musiro (105 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 58 more horse power than 1964 Alpine A 110. (47 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Daewoo Musiro should accelerate faster than 1964 Alpine A 110. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Daewoo Musiro weights approximately 460 kg more than 1964 Alpine A 110. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Alpine A 110 | 2000 Daewoo Musiro | |
Make | Alpine | Daewoo |
Model | A 110 | Musiro |
Year Released | 1964 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Rear | Middle |
Engine Size | 956 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 47 HP | 105 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Top Speed | 193 km/hour | 212 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 575 kg | 1035 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4260 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2140 mm | 2530 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 48 L |