1964 Alpine A 110 vs. 2003 Dodge Ram
To start off, 2003 Dodge Ram is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Alpine A 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Alpine A 110 would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Dodge Ram (215 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 166 more horse power than 1964 Alpine A 110. (49 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1964 Alpine A 110. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Dodge Ram weights approximately 1355 kg more than 1964 Alpine A 110. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1964 Alpine A 110 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Alpine A 110. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Dodge Ram, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Alpine A 110 | 2003 Dodge Ram | |
Make | Alpine | Dodge |
Model | A 110 | Ram |
Year Released | 1964 | 2003 |
Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 956 cc | 3700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 215 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 575 kg | 1930 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 5280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 2040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1900 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2140 mm | 3030 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 76 L |