1964 Alpine A 110 vs. 2003 Dodge Ram
To start off, 2003 Dodge Ram is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Alpine A 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Alpine A 110 would be higher. At 3,906 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Dodge Ram (173 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 126 more horse power than 1964 Alpine A 110. (47 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1964 Alpine A 110. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Dodge Ram weights approximately 1495 kg more than 1964 Alpine A 110. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 Dodge Ram is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Alpine A 110. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Dodge Ram will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Alpine A 110 | 2003 Dodge Ram | |
Make | Alpine | Dodge |
Model | A 110 | Ram |
Year Released | 1964 | 2003 |
Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 956 cc | 3906 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 47 HP | 173 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 575 kg | 2070 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 2030 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2140 mm | 2790 mm |