1964 Alpine A 110 vs. 2005 Dodge Ram
To start off, 2005 Dodge Ram is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Alpine A 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Alpine A 110 would be higher. At 8,277 cc (10 cylinders), 2005 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Dodge Ram (500 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 451 more horse power than 1964 Alpine A 110. (49 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1964 Alpine A 110. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Dodge Ram weights approximately 1738 kg more than 1964 Alpine A 110. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Alpine A 110 | 2005 Dodge Ram | |
Make | Alpine | Dodge |
Model | A 110 | Ram |
Year Released | 1964 | 2005 |
Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 956 cc | 8277 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 10 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 500 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 65 mm | 102 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 72 mm | 101 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 575 kg | 2313 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 5170 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 2040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1900 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2140 mm | 3070 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 98 L |