1964 Alpine A 110 vs. 2005 Lincoln LS
To start off, 2005 Lincoln LS is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Alpine A 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Alpine A 110 would be higher. At 2,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Lincoln LS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Lincoln LS (232 HP) has 185 more horse power than 1964 Alpine A 110. (47 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Lincoln LS should accelerate faster than 1964 Alpine A 110. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Lincoln LS weights approximately 1112 kg more than 1964 Alpine A 110. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Alpine A 110 | 2005 Lincoln LS | |
Make | Alpine | Lincoln |
Model | A 110 | LS |
Year Released | 1964 | 2005 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 956 cc | 2966 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 47 HP | 232 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 65 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 72 mm | 80 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 575 kg | 1687 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2140 mm | 2880 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 68 L |