1964 Alpine A 110 vs. 2009 Mazda BT-50
To start off, 2009 Mazda BT-50 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Alpine A 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Alpine A 110 would be higher. At 2,953 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mazda BT-50 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda BT-50 (154 HP @ 3200 RPM) has 105 more horse power than 1964 Alpine A 110. (49 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda BT-50 should accelerate faster than 1964 Alpine A 110.
Because 2009 Mazda BT-50 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Alpine A 110. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda BT-50 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Alpine A 110 | 2009 Mazda BT-50 | |
Make | Alpine | Mazda |
Model | A 110 | BT-50 |
Year Released | 1964 | 2009 |
Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 956 cc | 2953 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 154 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 65 mm | 96.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 72 mm | 102 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2140 mm | 3010 mm |