1964 Alpine A 110 vs. 2009 Mazda CX-9

To start off, 2009 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Alpine A 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Alpine A 110 would be higher. At 3,727 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda CX-9 (268 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 221 more horse power than 1964 Alpine A 110. (47 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1964 Alpine A 110.

Because 1964 Alpine A 110 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Alpine A 110. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-9, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Mazda CX-9 has automatic transmission and 1964 Alpine A 110 has manual transmission. 1964 Alpine A 110 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Mazda CX-9 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1964 Alpine A 110 2009 Mazda CX-9
Make Alpine Mazda
Model A 110 CX-9
Year Released 1964 2009
Body Type Coupe SUV
Engine Position Rear Front
Engine Size 956 cc 3727 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 47 HP 268 HP
Engine RPM 5200 RPM 6250 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Number of Seats 2 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Length 3860 mm 4600 mm
Vehicle Width 1470 mm 1940 mm
Vehicle Height 1140 mm 1730 mm
Wheelbase Size 2140 mm 2340 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 38 L 76 L