1964 Alpine A 110 vs. 2009 Nissan Murano
To start off, 2009 Nissan Murano is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Alpine A 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Alpine A 110 would be higher. At 3,498 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Nissan Murano is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Nissan Murano (265 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 216 more horse power than 1964 Alpine A 110. (49 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Nissan Murano should accelerate faster than 1964 Alpine A 110. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Nissan Murano weights approximately 871 kg more than 1964 Alpine A 110. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Nissan Murano is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Alpine A 110. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Nissan Murano will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Alpine A 110 | 2009 Nissan Murano | |
Make | Alpine | Nissan |
Model | A 110 | Murano |
Year Released | 1964 | 2009 |
Body Type | Coupe | Crossover |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 956 cc | 3498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 265 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 575 kg | 1446 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1710 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2140 mm | 2830 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 82 L |