1964 Alpine A 110 vs. 2010 Chrysler 300
To start off, 2010 Chrysler 300 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Alpine A 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Alpine A 110 would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Chrysler 300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Chrysler 300 (250 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 201 more horse power than 1964 Alpine A 110. (49 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Chrysler 300 should accelerate faster than 1964 Alpine A 110.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Chrysler 300 has automatic transmission and 1964 Alpine A 110 has manual transmission. 1964 Alpine A 110 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Chrysler 300 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Alpine A 110 | 2010 Chrysler 300 | |
Make | Alpine | Chrysler |
Model | A 110 | 300 |
Year Released | 1964 | 2010 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 956 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 250 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4999 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1882 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1483 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2140 mm | 3048 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 68 L |