1964 Alpine A 110 vs. 2012 Subaru Forester
To start off, 2012 Subaru Forester is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Alpine A 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Alpine A 110 would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Subaru Forester is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Subaru Forester (170 HP) has 121 more horse power than 1964 Alpine A 110. (49 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Subaru Forester should accelerate faster than 1964 Alpine A 110. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Subaru Forester weights approximately 922 kg more than 1964 Alpine A 110. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2012 Subaru Forester is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Alpine A 110. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Subaru Forester will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Alpine A 110 | 2012 Subaru Forester | |
Make | Alpine | Subaru |
Model | A 110 | Forester |
Year Released | 1964 | 2012 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 956 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 170 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 575 kg | 1497 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4559 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1781 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1699 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2140 mm | 2616 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 64 L |