1964 Alpine A vs. 1959 Berkeley QB
To start off, 1964 Alpine A is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Berkeley QB. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Berkeley QB would be higher. At 1,106 cc (4 cylinders), 1964 Alpine A is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Alpine A (59 HP) has 10 more horse power than 1959 Berkeley QB. (49 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Alpine A should accelerate faster than 1959 Berkeley QB. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Alpine A weights approximately 194 kg more than 1959 Berkeley QB. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1964 Alpine A is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Alpine A. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1959 Berkeley QB, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Alpine A | 1959 Berkeley QB | |
Make | Alpine | Berkeley |
Model | A | QB |
Year Released | 1964 | 1959 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1106 cc | 692 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 49 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 575 kg | 381 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 3400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1380 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1170 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 1990 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 25 L |