1964 Alpine A vs. 1968 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1968 Triumph 2000 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Alpine A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Alpine A would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Triumph 2000 (89 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 1964 Alpine A. (59 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Triumph 2000 should accelerate faster than 1964 Alpine A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 595 kg more than 1964 Alpine A. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Alpine A | 1968 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Alpine | Triumph |
Model | A | 2000 |
Year Released | 1964 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1106 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 575 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 64 L |