1964 Alpine A vs. 1979 Bristol 412
To start off, 1979 Bristol 412 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Alpine A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Alpine A would be higher. At 5,898 cc (8 cylinders), 1979 Bristol 412 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1979 Bristol 412 (171 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 112 more horse power than 1964 Alpine A. (59 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1979 Bristol 412 should accelerate faster than 1964 Alpine A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1979 Bristol 412 weights approximately 1115 kg more than 1964 Alpine A. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Alpine A | 1979 Bristol 412 | |
Make | Alpine | Bristol |
Model | A | 412 |
Year Released | 1964 | 1979 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1106 cc | 5898 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 171 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 575 kg | 1690 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2910 mm |