1964 Alpine A vs. 1983 Lancia Trevi
To start off, 1983 Lancia Trevi is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Alpine A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Alpine A would be higher. At 1,585 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Lancia Trevi is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Lancia Trevi (100 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 1964 Alpine A. (59 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1983 Lancia Trevi should accelerate faster than 1964 Alpine A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Lancia Trevi weights approximately 570 kg more than 1964 Alpine A. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1964 Alpine A is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Alpine A. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Lancia Trevi, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Alpine A | 1983 Lancia Trevi | |
Make | Alpine | Lancia |
Model | A | Trevi |
Year Released | 1964 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1106 cc | 1585 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 575 kg | 1145 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4330 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2550 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 52 L |