1964 Alpine A vs. 1991 Ford Taurus
To start off, 1991 Ford Taurus is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Alpine A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Alpine A would be higher. At 2,512 cc (4 cylinders), 1991 Ford Taurus is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Ford Taurus (89 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 1964 Alpine A. (59 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1991 Ford Taurus should accelerate faster than 1964 Alpine A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1991 Ford Taurus weights approximately 825 kg more than 1964 Alpine A. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1964 Alpine A is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Alpine A. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Ford Taurus, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Alpine A | 1991 Ford Taurus | |
Make | Alpine | Ford |
Model | A | Taurus |
Year Released | 1964 | 1991 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1106 cc | 2512 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 575 kg | 1400 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2700 mm |