1964 Alpine A vs. 1995 BMW 528
To start off, 1995 BMW 528 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Alpine A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Alpine A would be higher. At 2,793 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 BMW 528 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 BMW 528 (193 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 134 more horse power than 1964 Alpine A. (59 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1995 BMW 528 should accelerate faster than 1964 Alpine A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 BMW 528 weights approximately 1005 kg more than 1964 Alpine A. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Alpine A | 1995 BMW 528 | |
Make | Alpine | BMW |
Model | A | 528 |
Year Released | 1964 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1106 cc | 2793 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 193 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 575 kg | 1580 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2840 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 70 L |