1964 Alpine A vs. 2000 Chevrolet Suburban
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Suburban is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Alpine A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Alpine A would be higher. At 5,967 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Suburban is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chevrolet Suburban (317 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 258 more horse power than 1964 Alpine A. (59 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Suburban should accelerate faster than 1964 Alpine A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chevrolet Suburban weights approximately 1815 kg more than 1964 Alpine A. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Chevrolet Suburban is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Alpine A. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Suburban will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Alpine A | 2000 Chevrolet Suburban | |
Make | Alpine | Chevrolet |
Model | A | Suburban |
Year Released | 1964 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1106 cc | 5967 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 317 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 9 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 575 kg | 2390 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 5580 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1950 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1930 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 3310 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 117 L |