1964 Alpine A vs. 2000 Nissan Almera
To start off, 2000 Nissan Almera is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Alpine A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Alpine A would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Nissan Almera is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Nissan Almera (134 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 75 more horse power than 1964 Alpine A. (59 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Nissan Almera should accelerate faster than 1964 Alpine A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Nissan Almera weights approximately 865 kg more than 1964 Alpine A. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1964 Alpine A is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Alpine A. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Nissan Almera, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Alpine A | 2000 Nissan Almera | |
Make | Alpine | Nissan |
Model | A | Almera |
Year Released | 1964 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1106 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 134 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 575 kg | 1440 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1620 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2540 mm |