1964 Alpine A vs. 2000 SsangYong Musso
To start off, 2000 SsangYong Musso is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Alpine A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Alpine A would be higher. At 3,199 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 SsangYong Musso is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 SsangYong Musso (217 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 158 more horse power than 1964 Alpine A. (59 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 SsangYong Musso should accelerate faster than 1964 Alpine A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 SsangYong Musso weights approximately 1355 kg more than 1964 Alpine A. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 SsangYong Musso is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Alpine A. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 SsangYong Musso will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Alpine A | 2000 SsangYong Musso | |
| Make | Alpine | SsangYong |
| Model | A | Musso |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1106 cc | 3199 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 217 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 575 kg | 1930 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4650 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1860 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1740 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2640 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 80 L |
