1964 Alpine A vs. 2002 Toyota Caldina
To start off, 2002 Toyota Caldina is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Alpine A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Alpine A would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Toyota Caldina is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Toyota Caldina (256 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 197 more horse power than 1964 Alpine A. (59 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Toyota Caldina should accelerate faster than 1964 Alpine A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Toyota Caldina weights approximately 910 kg more than 1964 Alpine A. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 Toyota Caldina is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Alpine A. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Toyota Caldina will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Alpine A | 2002 Toyota Caldina | |
| Make | Alpine | Toyota |
| Model | A | Caldina |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1106 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 256 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 575 kg | 1485 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4520 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1750 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2710 mm |
