1964 Alpine A vs. 2003 Mazda Roadster
To start off, 2003 Mazda Roadster is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Alpine A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Alpine A would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Mazda Roadster is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mazda Roadster (118 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 59 more horse power than 1964 Alpine A. (59 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mazda Roadster should accelerate faster than 1964 Alpine A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mazda Roadster weights approximately 455 kg more than 1964 Alpine A. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Alpine A | 2003 Mazda Roadster | |
| Make | Alpine | Mazda |
| Model | A | Roadster |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1106 cc | 1598 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 118 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 575 kg | 1030 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 3960 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1240 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2270 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 48 L |
