1964 Alpine A vs. 2003 Subaru R2
To start off, 2003 Subaru R2 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Alpine A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Alpine A would be higher. At 1,106 cc (4 cylinders), 1964 Alpine A is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Alpine A (59 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 2003 Subaru R2. (52 HP @ 6400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Alpine A should accelerate faster than 2003 Subaru R2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Subaru R2 weights approximately 205 kg more than 1964 Alpine A.
Because 1964 Alpine A is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Alpine A. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Subaru R2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Alpine A | 2003 Subaru R2 | |
| Make | Alpine | Subaru |
| Model | A | R2 |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1106 cc | 658 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 52 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 575 kg | 780 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 3400 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1480 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2370 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 30 L |
