1964 Alpine A vs. 2005 Ford Falcon
To start off, 2005 Ford Falcon is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Alpine A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Alpine A would be higher. At 3,984 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Falcon (210 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 151 more horse power than 1964 Alpine A. (59 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1964 Alpine A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Falcon weights approximately 910 kg more than 1964 Alpine A. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Alpine A | 2005 Ford Falcon | |
Make | Alpine | Ford |
Model | A | Falcon |
Year Released | 1964 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1106 cc | 3984 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 210 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4900 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 575 kg | 1485 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2730 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 68 L |