1964 Alpine A vs. 2009 Dodge Dakota
To start off, 2009 Dodge Dakota is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Alpine A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Alpine A would be higher. At 3,701 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Dodge Dakota is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Dodge Dakota (211 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 152 more horse power than 1964 Alpine A. (59 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Dodge Dakota should accelerate faster than 1964 Alpine A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Dodge Dakota weights approximately 1116 kg more than 1964 Alpine A. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Dodge Dakota is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Alpine A. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Dodge Dakota will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Alpine A | 2009 Dodge Dakota | |
Make | Alpine | Dodge |
Model | A | Dakota |
Year Released | 1964 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1106 cc | 3701 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 211 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 575 kg | 1691 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 5560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 3340 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 83 L |