1964 Alpine A vs. 2009 Ford Escape
To start off, 2009 Ford Escape is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Alpine A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Alpine A would be higher. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Escape (171 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 112 more horse power than 1964 Alpine A. (59 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Escape should accelerate faster than 1964 Alpine A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Ford Escape weights approximately 391 kg more than 1964 Alpine A. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Ford Escape is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Alpine A. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Ford Escape will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Alpine A | 2009 Ford Escape | |
Make | Alpine | Ford |
Model | A | Escape |
Year Released | 1964 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 171 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 575 kg | 966 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 62 L |