1964 Alpine A vs. 2009 Renault Clio
To start off, 2009 Renault Clio is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Alpine A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Alpine A would be higher. At 1,149 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Renault Clio (60 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 1964 Alpine A. (59 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1964 Alpine A.
Because 1964 Alpine A is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Alpine A. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Alpine A | 2009 Renault Clio | |
Make | Alpine | Renault |
Model | A | Clio |
Year Released | 1964 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1106 cc | 1149 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1420 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2480 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 50 L |