1964 Alpine A vs. 2010 Cadillac STS
To start off, 2010 Cadillac STS is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Alpine A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Alpine A would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Cadillac STS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Cadillac STS (320 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 261 more horse power than 1964 Alpine A. (59 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Cadillac STS should accelerate faster than 1964 Alpine A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Cadillac STS weights approximately 1237 kg more than 1964 Alpine A. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Alpine A | 2010 Cadillac STS | |
Make | Alpine | Cadillac |
Model | A | STS |
Year Released | 1964 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1106 cc | 4600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 320 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 575 kg | 1812 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4996 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1844 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1463 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2957 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 64 L |