1964 Alpine A vs. 2010 Mazda 6
To start off, 2010 Mazda 6 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Alpine A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Alpine A would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mazda 6 (170 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 111 more horse power than 1964 Alpine A. (59 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1964 Alpine A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Mazda 6 weights approximately 926 kg more than 1964 Alpine A. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1964 Alpine A is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Alpine A. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Alpine A | 2010 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Alpine | Mazda |
Model | A | 6 |
Year Released | 1964 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1106 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 170 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 575 kg | 1501 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1839 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1471 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2789 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 70 L |