1964 Alpine A vs. 2010 Nissan Titan
To start off, 2010 Nissan Titan is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Alpine A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Alpine A would be higher. At 5,551 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Nissan Titan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Nissan Titan (317 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 258 more horse power than 1964 Alpine A. (59 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Nissan Titan should accelerate faster than 1964 Alpine A.
Because 2010 Nissan Titan is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Alpine A. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Nissan Titan will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Alpine A | 2010 Nissan Titan | |
| Make | Alpine | Nissan |
| Model | A | Titan |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1106 cc | 5551 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 317 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 6 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 5710 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 2030 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1940 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 3560 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 106 L |
