1964 Alpine A vs. 2011 Nissan Rogue
To start off, 2011 Nissan Rogue is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Alpine A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Alpine A would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Nissan Rogue is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Nissan Rogue (170 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 111 more horse power than 1964 Alpine A. (59 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Nissan Rogue should accelerate faster than 1964 Alpine A.
Because 1964 Alpine A is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Alpine A. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Nissan Rogue, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Alpine A | 2011 Nissan Rogue | |
Make | Alpine | Nissan |
Model | A | Rogue |
Year Released | 1964 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1106 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 170 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4681 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1801 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1659 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2690 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 60 L |