1964 Alpine A vs. 2012 Aston Martin DB9
To start off, 2012 Aston Martin DB9 is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Alpine A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Alpine A would be higher. At 5,900 cc (12 cylinders), 2012 Aston Martin DB9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Aston Martin DB9 (470 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 411 more horse power than 1964 Alpine A. (59 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Aston Martin DB9 should accelerate faster than 1964 Alpine A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Aston Martin DB9 weights approximately 1280 kg more than 1964 Alpine A. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Alpine A | 2012 Aston Martin DB9 | |
Make | Alpine | Aston Martin |
Model | A | DB9 |
Year Released | 1964 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1106 cc | 5900 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 470 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 575 kg | 1855 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4709 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1875 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1270 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2746 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 80 L |