1964 Alpine A vs. 2012 Ford C-Max
To start off, 2012 Ford C-Max is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Alpine A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Alpine A would be higher. At 1,560 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Ford C-Max is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Ford C-Max (95 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 36 more horse power than 1964 Alpine A. (59 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Ford C-Max should accelerate faster than 1964 Alpine A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Ford C-Max weights approximately 975 kg more than 1964 Alpine A. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1964 Alpine A is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Alpine A. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Ford C-Max, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Alpine A | 2012 Ford C-Max | |
Make | Alpine | Ford |
Model | A | C-Max |
Year Released | 1964 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1106 cc | 1560 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 95 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 575 kg | 1550 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1828 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1684 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2788 mm |