1964 Alpine A vs. 2012 Jaguar XK
To start off, 2012 Jaguar XK is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Alpine A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Alpine A would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Jaguar XK (385 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 326 more horse power than 1964 Alpine A. (59 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 1964 Alpine A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Jaguar XK weights approximately 1205 kg more than 1964 Alpine A. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Alpine A | 2012 Jaguar XK | |
| Make | Alpine | Jaguar |
| Model | A | XK |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1106 cc | 5000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 385 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 575 kg | 1780 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4793 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1892 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1328 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2751 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 61 L |
