1964 Alpine A vs. 2013 Chevrolet Suburban
To start off, 2013 Chevrolet Suburban is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Alpine A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Alpine A would be higher. At 5,300 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Chevrolet Suburban is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Chevrolet Suburban (316 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 257 more horse power than 1964 Alpine A. (59 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Chevrolet Suburban should accelerate faster than 1964 Alpine A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Chevrolet Suburban weights approximately 1998 kg more than 1964 Alpine A. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Alpine A | 2013 Chevrolet Suburban | |
Make | Alpine | Chevrolet |
Model | A | Suburban |
Year Released | 1964 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1106 cc | 5300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 316 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 575 kg | 2573 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 5649 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 2009 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1951 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 3302 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 117 L |