1964 Alpine A vs. 2013 Jaguar XJ
To start off, 2013 Jaguar XJ is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Alpine A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Alpine A would be higher. At 2,995 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Jaguar XJ (335 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 276 more horse power than 1964 Alpine A. (59 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 1964 Alpine A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Jaguar XJ weights approximately 1180 kg more than 1964 Alpine A. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Jaguar XJ is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Alpine A. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Jaguar XJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Alpine A | 2013 Jaguar XJ | |
Make | Alpine | Jaguar |
Model | A | XJ |
Year Released | 1964 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1106 cc | 2995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 335 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 575 kg | 1755 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 5127 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 2105 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1456 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 3032 mm |