1964 Alpine A vs. 2013 Toyota Sequoia
To start off, 2013 Toyota Sequoia is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Alpine A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Alpine A would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Toyota Sequoia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Toyota Sequoia (376 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 317 more horse power than 1964 Alpine A. (59 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Toyota Sequoia should accelerate faster than 1964 Alpine A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Toyota Sequoia weights approximately 2139 kg more than 1964 Alpine A. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Alpine A | 2013 Toyota Sequoia | |
Make | Alpine | Toyota |
Model | A | Sequoia |
Year Released | 1964 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1106 cc | 5700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 376 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 575 kg | 2714 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 5210 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1955 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 3100 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 100 L |