1964 Aston Martin DB5 vs. 2013 Mini Countryman
To start off, 2013 Mini Countryman is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Aston Martin DB5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Aston Martin DB5 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Aston Martin DB5 weights approximately 72 kg more than 2013 Mini Countryman.
Because 2013 Mini Countryman is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Aston Martin DB5. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mini Countryman will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1964 Aston Martin DB5 (389 Nm @ 3850 RPM) has 149 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mini Countryman. (240 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 1964 Aston Martin DB5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mini Countryman.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Aston Martin DB5 | 2013 Mini Countryman | |
Make | Aston Martin | Mini |
Model | DB5 | Countryman |
Year Released | 1964 | 2013 |
Body Type | Coupe | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 314 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 389 Nm | 240 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3850 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 96 mm | 77 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 85 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 1458 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4110 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1996 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1561 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2595 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 86 L | 47 L |