1964 Austin A 110 vs. 1963 Ford Taunus
To start off, 1964 Austin A 110 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Ford Taunus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Ford Taunus would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Austin A 110 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Austin A 110 (120 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 82 more horse power than 1963 Ford Taunus. (38 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Austin A 110 should accelerate faster than 1963 Ford Taunus. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Austin A 110 weights approximately 759 kg more than 1963 Ford Taunus. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Austin A 110 | 1963 Ford Taunus | |
Make | Austin | Ford |
Model | A 110 | Taunus |
Year Released | 1964 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2912 cc | 1183 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 38 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 83.4 mm | 80.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 58.9 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1604 kg | 845 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4950 mm | 4250 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2530 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 50 L |