1964 Austin A 110 vs. 1980 Toyota Celica
To start off, 1980 Toyota Celica is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Austin A 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Austin A 110 would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Austin A 110 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Austin A 110 (120 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 1980 Toyota Celica. (118 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Austin A 110 should accelerate faster than 1980 Toyota Celica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Austin A 110 weights approximately 422 kg more than 1980 Toyota Celica. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1964 Austin A 110 (222 Nm @ 2750 RPM) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Toyota Celica. (215 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1964 Austin A 110 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Toyota Celica.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Austin A 110 | 1980 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Austin | Toyota |
Model | A 110 | Celica |
Year Released | 1964 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2912 cc | 2563 cc |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 222 Nm | 215 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1604 kg | 1182 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4950 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2640 mm |