1964 Austin A 110 vs. 1984 Buick Skyhawk
To start off, 1984 Buick Skyhawk is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Austin A 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Austin A 110 would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Austin A 110 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Austin A 110 (120 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 1984 Buick Skyhawk. (89 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Austin A 110 should accelerate faster than 1984 Buick Skyhawk. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Austin A 110 weights approximately 524 kg more than 1984 Buick Skyhawk. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1964 Austin A 110 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Austin A 110. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Buick Skyhawk, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Austin A 110 | 1984 Buick Skyhawk | |
Make | Austin | Buick |
Model | A 110 | Skyhawk |
Year Released | 1964 | 1984 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2912 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1604 kg | 1080 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4950 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2580 mm |