1964 Austin A 110 vs. 2004 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2004 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Austin A 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Austin A 110 would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Austin A 110 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan X-Trail (143 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 1964 Austin A 110. (120 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 1964 Austin A 110. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Austin A 110 weights approximately 319 kg more than 2004 Nissan X-Trail.
Let's talk about torque, 1964 Austin A 110 (222 Nm @ 2750 RPM) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Nissan X-Trail. (192 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1964 Austin A 110 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Nissan X-Trail.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Austin A 110 | 2004 Nissan X-Trail | |
| Make | Austin | Nissan |
| Model | A 110 | X-Trail |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2912 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 120 HP | 143 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 222 Nm | 192 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1604 kg | 1285 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2540 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 60 L |
