1964 Austin A 110 vs. 2005 Mitsubishi Nessie
To start off, 2005 Mitsubishi Nessie is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Austin A 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Austin A 110 would be higher.
Because 2005 Mitsubishi Nessie is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Austin A 110. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mitsubishi Nessie will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Austin A 110 | 2005 Mitsubishi Nessie | |
Make | Austin | Mitsubishi |
Model | A 110 | Nessie |
Year Released | 1964 | 2005 |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4950 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1960 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1820 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2790 mm |