1964 Austin A 110 vs. 2008 Toyota Condor
To start off, 2008 Toyota Condor is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Austin A 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Austin A 110 would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Austin A 110 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Toyota Condor weights approximately 42 kg more than 1964 Austin A 110.
Because 2008 Toyota Condor is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Austin A 110. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Toyota Condor will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1964 Austin A 110 (222 Nm @ 2750 RPM) has 27 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Toyota Condor. (195 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1964 Austin A 110 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Toyota Condor.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Austin A 110 | 2008 Toyota Condor | |
Make | Austin | Toyota |
Model | A 110 | Condor |
Year Released | 1964 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2912 cc | 2436 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 222 Nm | 195 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 83.4 mm | 95 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 86 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1604 kg | 1646 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4950 mm | 5020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2660 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 70 L |