1964 Austin A 110 vs. 2010 Renault Fluence
To start off, 2010 Renault Fluence is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Austin A 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Austin A 110 would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Austin A 110 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Renault Fluence (140 HP) has 20 more horse power than 1964 Austin A 110. (120 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Renault Fluence should accelerate faster than 1964 Austin A 110. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Austin A 110 weights approximately 379 kg more than 2010 Renault Fluence.
Because 1964 Austin A 110 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Austin A 110. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Renault Fluence, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Austin A 110 | 2010 Renault Fluence | |
Make | Austin | Renault |
Model | A 110 | Fluence |
Year Released | 1964 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2912 cc | 1500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 140 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1604 kg | 1225 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4950 mm | 4618 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1809 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1478 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2702 mm |