1964 Austin A 40 vs. 1952 Nissan Sedan
To start off, 1964 Austin A 40 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Nissan Sedan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Nissan Sedan would be higher. At 1,098 cc (4 cylinders), 1964 Austin A 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Austin A 40 (47 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 1952 Nissan Sedan. (18 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Austin A 40 should accelerate faster than 1952 Nissan Sedan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Nissan Sedan weights approximately 30 kg more than 1964 Austin A 40.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Austin A 40 | 1952 Nissan Sedan | |
| Make | Austin | Nissan |
| Model | A 40 | Sedan |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1952 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1098 cc | 860 cc |
| Horse Power | 47 HP | 18 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 760 kg | 790 kg |
