1964 Austin A 40 vs. 1958 Lancia Appia
To start off, 1964 Austin A 40 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Lancia Appia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Lancia Appia would be higher. At 1,098 cc (4 cylinders), 1964 Austin A 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Austin A 40 (47 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 1958 Lancia Appia. (43 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Austin A 40 should accelerate faster than 1958 Lancia Appia. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Lancia Appia weights approximately 104 kg more than 1964 Austin A 40.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1964 Austin A 40 (82 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 Lancia Appia. (77 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1964 Austin A 40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 Lancia Appia.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Austin A 40 | 1958 Lancia Appia | |
Make | Austin | Lancia |
Model | A 40 | Appia |
Year Released | 1964 | 1958 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1098 cc | 1090 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 47 HP | 43 HP |
Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 82 Nm | 77 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 760 kg | 864 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3690 mm | 3980 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1430 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2220 mm | 2520 mm |