1964 Austin A 40 vs. 1958 Saab 92B
To start off, 1964 Austin A 40 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Saab 92B. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Saab 92B would be higher. At 1,098 cc (4 cylinders), 1964 Austin A 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Saab 92B weights approximately 45 kg more than 1964 Austin A 40.
Because 1964 Austin A 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Austin A 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1958 Saab 92B, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Austin A 40 | 1958 Saab 92B | |
Make | Austin | Saab |
Model | A 40 | 92B |
Year Released | 1964 | 1958 |
Engine Size | 1098 cc | 764 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 47 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 760 kg | 805 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3690 mm | 3960 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2220 mm | 2480 mm |