1964 Austin A 40 vs. 1966 Bizzarrini GT
To start off, 1966 Bizzarrini GT is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 1,895 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 Bizzarrini GT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Bizzarrini GT (108 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 61 more horse power than 1964 Austin A 40. (47 HP @ 5100 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Bizzarrini GT should accelerate faster than 1964 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Austin A 40 weights approximately 80 kg more than 1966 Bizzarrini GT.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Bizzarrini GT (157 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 75 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Austin A 40. (82 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1966 Bizzarrini GT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Austin A 40.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Austin A 40 | 1966 Bizzarrini GT | |
Make | Austin | Bizzarrini |
Model | A 40 | GT |
Year Released | 1964 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1098 cc | 1895 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 47 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 82 Nm | 157 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 760 kg | 680 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3690 mm | 3800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1050 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2220 mm | 2210 mm |