1964 Austin A 40 vs. 1972 DAF 66
To start off, 1972 DAF 66 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 1,108 cc (4 cylinders), 1972 DAF 66 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Austin A 40 (47 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 1972 DAF 66. (45 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Austin A 40 should accelerate faster than 1972 DAF 66. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 DAF 66 weights approximately 66 kg more than 1964 Austin A 40.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1964 Austin A 40 (82 Nm) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 DAF 66. (75 Nm). This means 1964 Austin A 40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 DAF 66.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Austin A 40 | 1972 DAF 66 | |
Make | Austin | DAF |
Model | A 40 | 66 |
Year Released | 1964 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1098 cc | 1108 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 47 HP | 45 HP |
Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 82 Nm | 75 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 64.6 mm | 70 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83.7 mm | 72 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 760 kg | 826 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3690 mm | 3880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2220 mm | 2270 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 42 L |